Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Names Of The Parts Of A Sailboat Model letter to the Senate to try to stop law-Sinde Biden




After writing my article Represióny fear for the people. Another scandal surrounding the Biden-Sinde law , which spoke of the possibility of sending a letter to the Senate with the intention of stopping the Biden-Sinde law, there are people I asked about a possible sample letter.

Thanks to Josep Jover, of Juridics Studies, who kindly sent me a copy of the written presented by some associations in the Senate, I have the possibility of aproposed model is consistent with law and have adapted to the extent of my tastes and needs ...

The idea is to refer this model by certified mail, return receipt and stamped at the post office, the Senate Record. The procedure is very simple. Write the letter and personalize with our data and look. Then we print two copies and a post office there, we seal the two copies, one we will keep it as evidence of envíoy will put the other one in an envelope and send by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following address:

Senate Record

Spain Spain & Marina Plaza; About girls, wave, 8 28013 Madrid

The text that I propose is as follows (the one between the dashed lines), which of course, be changed at will since it is just a model and I do not expect everyone to think and ask what I do:

--------------------------

SR . SENATE PRESIDENT

Mr. / Ms. ................. of age, with DNI / NIF .............. and located ...................................... First

you appear and how best to proceed in law

SAYS

That, middle of this document and under the law currently in effect, exercising the right of petition on the basis of the following:

CONSIDERATIONS:

1 That the Economics Committee of Congress rejected , on 20 December, with votes against all opposition political groups, the additional provision of Law Sustainable Economy (LES), which provided an emergency procedure that would shut down or block access to web pages.

2 nd That the Congress of Deputies in 2010 constituted a subcommittee & oacutee, n, under the Committee on Culture, to discuss in-depth reform of the LPI (Law 23/2006 of July 7 - Text of the Copyright Act) to which he had begun to appear different personalities and sectoral representatives.

3 º if there is a technology breakthrough, and it's Internet, new opportunities, while some sectors are heading for a deep conversion (just remember the industrial restructuring prompted by electricity or the car to give a few examples.)

4 The content industry based on the promotion,production, reproduction and marketing of copies of content on physical media (books, CDs, videos, newspaper) is without doubt one of the most affected by emergence of the Internet and new technologies. But we must understand that these media are outdated, unsustainable, expensive and difficult product distribution. The network replaces the traditional channel of distribution (kiosks, local ,..), serves as the lever for promocióny becoming more dispensable the physical support for the new electronic terminals: a single terminal for all content. At the level econ &; Oacute; monkey, we found that the storage cost tends to zero and it is also extremely easy to exchange content and all this in a comprehensive and nearly instantaneous. Socially, there are values such as ecology, access to information, cooperation creacióny or the right to share, which are enhanced through the use of new technologies.

5 .- However, the need for content grows exponentially with the advent of new technologies, which means that the operator has more and more opportunities. That is, every time you consume more, but otherwiseay Spain may be, on the basis of their language, a great creative power in the new global information society if we create an appropriate and properly promoted.

6 .- In any process of change is difficult to see which is the regulatory model of sustainability and finally triumphing in the future to develop new business models, but nobody doubts that it is a challenge important that will determine our future development as a society and as individuals.

7 .- Recent initiatives such as the encounter resulted from the Director of the Film Academy, Alex de la Iglesia, with organizations of Internet users, shows that whenpracticing dialogue and constructive debate, it appears that is much more that unites, to groups of Internet users and creators, that separates us. Therefore, in light of the foregoing,

MR. SENATE PRESIDENT'S REQUEST

A) Have of this application on behalf of the person signing, and his views have to exercise the right of petition to be transferred to all the spokespersons of political parties representation in the Senate.

B) To accept the decisions taken at the Congress of Deputies and not to introduce new provisions relating to Intellectual Property Law EcSustainable ECONOMIES its passage through the Senate.

C) To urge all parties to address a fundamental reform the reform of Law 23/2006, which had started last year by the Subcommittee, under the Commission Culture on the basis of dialogue, transparency and serenity, which requires a reform that will determine our future as a country where real and virtual worlds.

D) That the same Committee on Petitions, the move to the parliamentary groups to analyze the importance of avoiding hasty decisions, which generated much controversy and social rejection, while deteriorationran the image of public institutions in society.

As of justice that apply in the ....... ........... to .......... , 2011

(SIGN HERE)

IDEOLOGY Ideology on which I base my request to Senators and political groups:

1 .- defend intellectual property in meaning and limits defined by the UN in its General Comment No. 17 (2005) [1] as expressed in the Charter for Innovation, creativity and access to knowledge [2] for the Culture Forum . I think the author should be free and have the toolsto allow effective management of their rights, in the way you want and benefit from the protection
moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic Elo which she is the author, as a human right.

2 .- pirateríay not advocating not defend those who do business with third-party content, something that is actionable under the current legislation and without the need for legislative reform, both by civil and criminal.

3 .- sustainability and defend the free market and respect for the law, como foundations for market development and the content industry, as provided in Article 38 of the English Constitution.


4 .- In developing new rules and laws should consider putting the general interest and fundamental rights, the particular interest or sector. It makes no sense to keep such as a digital Canon harm the operator to which it wants to defend the benefit of intermediaries. I think the second final provision of the Law of Sustainable Economy, is useless because you can not penalize the link and it puts legitimate intellectual property interests, fundamental rightss in the procedure exists and is also contrary to what is stated in Article 4 of the Draft Law on Sustainable Economy in relation to the quality of regulation, which is a contradiction.

5 .- I care for and be respectful in language as the creator and the city are the ends of the value chain of content industry. We both need and our future is in Internet. The future of one passes through the respect for others and therefore, no pirates, no wars, no cowardly or brave, I can not be piracy legal, are citizens, Listeners, Artists, Restructuring, Crisis.

6 .- I believe to be respetar all models of exploitation. As has happened with other media, Internet, live together the free, funded through taxes or advertising, other payment to be direct or indirect. Those that are sustainable sobrevivirány therefore it is important to support the sustainability and not one model or another. Analog camera makers do not go calling pirates digital camera users and have had to restructure their business or simply close them if they have not been able to adapt to change, but that is the essence of economics to market.

7 .- We believe that autorregulacióNo can help develop new models and this will be more effective to the extent that there is a framework for dialogue and understanding fluid the situation facing the various sectors.

8 .- We must accept that this is a process of restructuring the content sector and not only to a management problem of intellectual property rights.

9 .- The future of content necessarily involves the Internet and new technologies.

10 .- Nobody has the magic solution to move from one model to another with no traumas, but you have to give solution & amp; oacute n urgency to the problem of orphan works and which are off the market for too long, when you come before intellectual property rights of the human right of access to culture. You must also define a system of exploitation of works funded by public money and taking into account recommended by the Committee of Wise Men of the EU in its report "New Renaissance." We must also look at the legislation using free licenses and comercializacióny new models of distribution of works and the provision of proteccióny lpublic domain as [3].

11 .- It should be adapting the structure of the Ministry of Culture in order to respond to the changing needs of authors, to the public domain broadcast proteccióny ; public and the new digital model, so that is fully guaranteed as provided in Article 44 of the Constitution.

12 .- consider necessary to adapt as quickly as possible, Intellectual Property Law to the content of the two sentences [4] [5] of the Court of Justice of the European Union against the application indiscriminate compensation for private copying (Canon Digital), to companies, freelancers and administrations public. Like, if possible, other authors pay more rational and less discriminatory society.

13 .- defend all fundamental rights enshrined in the English Constitution and in particular, all requiring a previous judicial decision to be restricted, considering that it is necessary to live fully democracy.

Therefore, any action taken regarding these matters should be preceded by an extensive debate on the opportunity to engage with all actors and stakeholders and those responsible for regulationShould listen and look to the future, as recommended in Chapter I of the Draft Law on Sustainable Economy.

LINKS:

[1] http://red-sostenible.net/images/0/0e/ONU_DERECHOS_LPI.pdf
[2] http://www.kriptopolis.org/innovacion creative-knowledge-
[3] http://fcforum.net/es/
[4] http://estaticos.elmundo.es/documentos/2010/10/21/sentencia_canon.pdf
[ 5] http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2011/01/14/navegante/1295035251.html


---------------- ----------

& amp; quot; Fernando Acero Martín Copyleft 2011. Verbatim copying, translation and distribution of this article is permitted in Entire Any digital medium, this notice is preserved Provided. " Quotation is allowed. "

0 comments:

Post a Comment