This is the press release released by RedSOStenible in relation to the \u0026lt;a href = "http://www.elpais.com/elpaismedia/ultimahora/media/201101/24/cultura / 20110124elpepucul_1_Pes_PDF.pdf "> agreement [PDF] \u0026lt;/ a> by the PP, PSOE and CiU on amendments to include in the Biden-Sinde law prior to its passage in the Senate:
SINDEcoro , SINDEcencia, SINDEbate, SINDErecho, SINDEmocracia. NOT A LAW-SINDE BIDEN
The new text is an elaborate legal structure to underpin that intellectual property is above the fundamental rights of citizens and not evenis a judge who will assess if this is breached or not [1]. The will of PSOE, CiU and PP not only protect the interests of the entertainment industry, mostly above-American human rights as expressed by the UN [2] if not, above all, ensure your power Prevalence will own citizens on avoiding Internet exercised unifying the advent of more direct democracy, higher quality and that encourages greater social justice and empowerment of the citizenry.
The vote in the Senate is within a month. We have a month to let them know they made a mistake and to rectify. A law is nothing more than censorshipto and control, not protecting the artists or entrepreneurs, which criminalizes progress. The law of arrogance and fear. The senators voted for open lists. We will not vote for those who have turned their back on people, more concerned with interests that have nothing to do with democratic representation and the rights of authors and civil society.
parties will turn on the network for the elections. There the citizens expect.
Contact: 639025865 CHTML
XC [1] To quote the text concrete things:
- We pursue "the contents that violate these rights if the provider, directly or indirectly acting for profit or to have caused or likely to cause property damage "
The phrase" be subject "is so broad that it is Google, sites with p2p software and of course, intended to criminalize the act of" ; pair ", ie Internet itself. If you pursue what is likely to attack the physical integrity to ban knives. CHT MLXC
- We use the term "Judicial Authority" when the Constitution requires "judicial resolution."
[2].
http://red-sostenible.net/images/0/0e/ONU_DERECHOS_LPI.pdf
"Copyleft 2011
Fernando Acero Martín. Verbatim copying, translation and distribution of this article is permitted in Entire Any digital medium, this notice is preserved Provided. " Quotation is allowed. "
For who wants to sign:
0 comments:
Post a Comment