all knew it was a secret so loudly, that in the last edition of (D) evolution Summit 2010, there were people searching for a friend American. Now Wikileaks has given reason to suspect that the U.S. audiovisual industry was behind the wording of the Second Final Provision of Law Sustainable Economy also n known as the "Sinde." Thus, we find messages from the U.S. embassy as e ste, with clear allusions to the Minister Sebastian , which was sent on the occasion of FICOD 2009 (International Digital Content Forum) . But the U.S. Embassy hit every club possible, including the Secretary of State for Telecommunications and Information Society, D. Francisco Ros, who at that time, he fights as can the ugly issue of "piracy" in Spain.
Although most of the English Ministers downplay or credibility Wikileaks leaksI think that effort is now in vain. The reality is palpable and leaks show to be true, all suspected to be had about the origin and destination of the "Law Sinde" and the famous and infamous 301 List. The fact is that there are still many messages to analyze the U.S. Embassy in relation to intellectual property in Spain, we'll see what comes out.
In fact, international headlines and spell it, " No surprise: Wikileaks shows that the entertainment industry in the U.S. wrote the new English law oncopyright " , and cables Wikileaks reveal that the U.S. wrote the bill on the Copyrigh " .
But when it hurts all of this, is that while foreign powers lobbies and write our laws to their advantage, against the sovereignty of the English people and to the detriment of their fundamental rights, our Fathers of the Fatherland have a nasty habit of reacting negatively when attempting to engage citizens in public affairs, although it is certainly, that such participation is a constitutional right referred to in Article 23 of our Constitution .
But I think the biggest blunder in this sense, occurred during the vote on net neutrality, when our Senators described as "unacceptable external interference that degrades the image and work of the Senate " , citizen participation in that vote.
Indeed, during the infamous meeting of the Senate for more preocupacióny enfado of citizenship, more than one senator proved that he had no idea what he was talking about. In fact, this is a good example the average level of debate, in which ignorance or interest, mixed apples with oranges.
As stated Enrique Dans, professor at IE Business School and blogger specializing in new technologies, which is unacceptable, is that " lobbying and influence can do what want "and citizens are considered" unacceptable external factors that degrade the imagents and work Senate. "
At this point, the only consistent to respect the sovereignty of the English people, that is, to respect at least the Constitution says in Article 1.2, would to immediately withdraw Second Final Provision of Law Sustainable Economy .
And as we have said before , instead of denying the undeniable, our legislators should start working on a new copyright law that arises from the soberaníay the consenso of the English, and not interested pressures of lobbies and foreign powers. Let's face it, if "Sinde Act" has not been the result of the sovereignty of the English people, is not, nor will ever be, a constitutional law.
12/09/2010 20:39 HOURS UPDATE:
recommend read this excellent article by David Maeztu:
Source of Law Sinde as Kipre of cables the embassy in Spain
"Copyleft 2010 Fernando Acero Martín. Verbatim copying, translation and distEntire ribution of this article is permitted in Any digital medium, Provided this notice is preserved. Quotation is allowed. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment